One might argue that lowering the mechanical demands of the game will not make it too easy to play because Starcraft still has sheer endless strategical depth. Nobody wants to play or watch tic-tac-toe because it's easy.
This is true for any kind of competition. No challenge turns the game into nothing but a time sink, which leads to players as well as viewers losing interest. While some people might fit this stereotype, I think it's an unfair characterization of somebody who wants SC2 to be a challenging game.Įasy games are not enjoyable for anyone who invests a lot of time into gaming because there is no challenge for them. Sadly, I feel like a lot of people in this community stereotype anyone who wants to argue for the difficulty of the game to be an entitled elitist that jerks off for being better at a game than somebody else. I do understand that making a game unintuitive to play just to make it difficult to play is stupid. I am not an elitist that "wants to feel superior to moba players" just because I want to play a challenging game. This post is directed to all the members of the community that think that making SC2 easier to play (for example by slowing down the pace of the game) would benefit the game. This post is not directed to Blizzard, I do not feel that they are making the game too easy to play. r/wow /r/diablo /r/hearthstone /r/heroesofthestorm /r/overwatch Same- and similar-topic submissions that exceed 4 per top 25 Promotional submissions that exceed "2 per 1 per 1"ĭuplicate results posts for the same individual match will be removed. To hide spoilers use format: (/spoiler) ( details)ĭeceptive links to shock sites, malware, etc
#DIFFICULTY LEVEL OF STARCRAFT 2 GAME VERIFICATION#
Green verification check mark guide and verified users list Use the "Filters" menu across the top to tailor the content here. “We've got a bunch of other things in singleplayer,” Chris tells us, “like tech purchase and research, and a detailed story mode.Chat on discord PiG with a story of a community member's struggles Weekly help a noob thread In the singleplayer campaign he resurfaces, ready to pump napalm from his dual flamethrowers. The Firebat – a pressure-suited flamechucking assault trooper from the first game – has been excised from multiplayer thanks to balancing issues, replaced with the similarly beefy Marauder.
Some of these forces are unique to the singleplayer campaign. Assuming, that is, you can organise your forces. Facing off against increasingly bitey waves of the swarm, you must provide safe passage for the stranded men.
Who's bad?įortunately, badass Terran space-hero Jim Raynor is in the vicinity. Between the two is a road, and that road is infested with Zerg, each one hungry for soft human flesh. One mission sticks in the memory: a small band of Terran workers, mouthing off with the southern drawl of good old boys from Louisiana, are desperate to get offworld before they become Zerg-fodder. We've seen examples to back this up, just to be sure Blizzard aren't fibbing. We're taking singleplayer in very different directions this time – each mission is its own minigame in many instances and that is not the case in multiplayer.” “Some people are under the impression that singleplayer is the training ground for multiplayer, and we actually don't view it that way.
0 kommentar(er)
